Skip to content
April 29, 2015 / ftth

Docker may just have won the container war

In a previous post, i discussed virtualization technologies as seen under the scope of the largest ready-made appliance catalog, comparing containers and image-based techs: OpenVZ, Docker and vmware images.

“Standard”/format-wise, even if Docker clearly had the popularity edge for some time already, launching VMWare images is still the gold standard behind company firewalls; however, the announce from VMWare to support Docker natively through their Open Source Lightwave and Photon projects on April 20th is indiscutably big news: the king of virtualization will support Docker (as well as CoreOS Rocket — LXC under the hood — and Pivotal Garden container formats), which in my opinion is the last nail on the coffin of OpenVZ, and the consecration for Docker.

Shortly before that, Google announced and published Kubernetes on the beginning of April, it’s own Open Source container orchestration solution built on top of CoreOS and Docker (and working on Rocket support). Kubernetes comes with multi-provider support (Azure, AWS, Rackspace, VMWare Vsphere …) and a few app examples (WordPress / MySQL, Celery / RabbitMQ, Cassandra, …).

Last November, AWS added ECS (EC2 Container Service) which is about running Docker images, as did Microsoft announce for Azure, and even Windows Server end of February.

So many announcements at the same time, VMWare adding support for containers with Docker in an Open Source project, and at the same time Google publishing Kubernetes, their next-generation container orchestration software based on Docker even before the scientific publication as well as launching a managed version of Kubernetes, Google Container Engine

Docker is there to stay !


One Comment

Leave a Comment
  1. JFGigand / May 1 2015 3:40 pm

    I think the Dockerfile is successful because it offers a simple description for machine *launching*, which is the concern of PaaS and orchestration. It’s sort of a LiLo/Grub: start an init process with pre-mounted FS!

    Whether the Dockerfile is practical for *working* remains in debate. These are 2 concerns. Whatever tool is used for working with system configuration, the output built machine is well described using the Dockerfile standard which offers a practical interface across PaaS providers: init process path, volume mounts, port binding.

    Thanks for these great news 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: